clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Should we be worried about the Cleveland Indians only beating bad teams?

The Cleveland Indians currently have a record of 57-42. But does that mean they are actually good at baseball?

Tito wants you to embrace the awesomeness that is the 2016 Cleveland Indians.
Tito wants you to embrace the awesomeness that is the 2016 Cleveland Indians.
David Richard-USA TODAY Sports

In one of the threads on Let's Go Tribe  yesterday, there was a... lively discussion on whether or not the 2016 Cleveland Indians are a good baseball team. There are many pieces of evidence that would seem to support an argument in the affirmative: the overall win record, the run differential, the starting pitching, and so on. But some folks have noted that, when playing better teams, the Indians tend to struggle. Is this a phenomenon exclusive to the team from Northeast Ohio, or do all good teams play better against sub-par competition?

To begin, I will preface these findings by saying that I am using FanGraphs projected final standings in order to determine whether teams fall in the "Over .500" or "Under .500" category.  This may be different than where teams currently sit in the standings, but it will (hopefully) give a complete picture of teams and what their actual talent is. According to Fangraphs, these are the teams that are expected to have a winning record in 2016:

Team Expected Wins Expected Losses Expected Win %
Cubs 96 66 .593
Nationals 93 69 .574
Giants 92 70 .569
Dodgers 92 70 .569
Indians 91 71 .562
Red Sox 91 71 .562
Blue Jays 90 72 .557
Orioles 90 72 .557
Rangers 88 74 .544
Astros 88 74 .544
Cardinals 86 76 .532
Mets 86 76 .532
Marlins 86 76 .532
Tigers 84 78 .519
Mariners 84 78 .519
Yankees 83 79 .515
Pirates 83 79 .515

Let's start with the Cleveland Indians, since that's why I assume you're all here. Of the above teams, the Cleveland Indians have so far played against the Red Sox, Mets, Mariners, Tigers, Astros, Orioles, Rangers, Yankees, Blue Jays and Nationals. Here's how they've done against each of those teams:

Opponent Wins Losses Runs Scored Runs Allowed Run Differential
Red Sox 2 3 16 28 -12
Mets 1 2 12 17 -5
Mariners 3 4 20 30 -10
Tigers 11 1 79 36 +43
Astros 1 2 8 12 -4
Orioles 1 5 25 31 -6
Rangers 1 2 10 20 -10
Yankees 1 3 27 25 +2
Blue Jays 2 2 13 28 -15
Nationals 1 1 8 10 -2
TOTAL 24 25 218 237 -19

Overall, the Indians have a pretty poor run differential when it comes to playing teams at or above .500, but their record against those teams is better than what you would expect. Obviously having an 11-1 record against Detroit is helpful, but regardless, it's virtually a coin flip when Cleveland is up against better teams. Again, is that normal? Here are the same tables for the current division leaders as well as the teams who would nab a wild card spot if the season were to end tomorrow:

AL East: Baltimore Orioles

Opponent Wins Losses Runs Scored Runs Allowed Run Differential
Red Sox 6 4 61 54 +7
Rangers 1 3 21 23 -2
Blue Jays 5 5 52 60 -8
Yankees 5 5 26 37 -11
Tigers 3 1 22 14 +8
Mariners 1 6 22 50 -28
Astros 0 3 7 11 -4
Indians 5 1 31 25 +6
Dodgers 2 1 15 12 +3
TOTAL 28 29 257 286 -29

AL West: Texas Rangers

Opponent Wins Losses Runs Scored Runs Allowed Run Differential
Mariners 8 4 60 49 +11
Orioles 3 1 23 21 +2
Astros 9 1 45 28 +17
Yankees 4 3 38 24 +14
Blue Jays 3 4 21 36 -15
Tigers 3 0 23 9 +14
Pirates 2 1 12 13 -1
Indians 2 1 20 10 +10
Cardinals 3 0 10 7 +3
Red Sox 3 3 41 38 +3
Cubs 1 2 5 10 -4
TOTAL 41 20 298 245 +53

AL Wild Card #1: Toronto Blue Jays

Opponent Wins Losses Runs Scored Runs Allowed Run Differential
Red Sox 7 6 62 62 0
Yankees 7 2 39 21 +18
Orioles 5 5 60 52 +8
Rangers 4 3 36 21 +15
Dodgers 1 2 9 12 -3
Giants 2 1 11 6 +5
Tigers 4 3 28 24 +4
Indians 2 2 28 13 +15
Mariners 1 2 8 16 -8
TOTAL 33 26 281 227 +54

AL Wild Card #2: Boston Red Sox

Opponent Wins Losses Runs Scored Runs Allowed Run Differential
Indians 3 2 28 16 +12
Blue Jays 6 7 62 62 0
Orioles 4 6 54 61 -7
Astros 5 2 49 37 +12
Yankees 6 3 40 29 +11
Giants 3 1 21 12 +9
Mariners 2 1 12 11 +1
Rangers 3 3 38 41 -3
Tigers 0 3 13 17 -4
TOTAL 32 28 317 286 +31

Of the five "contending" American League teams, only 2 of them have a negative run differential and a losing record against "winning" teams. Oddly enough, those two teams (Cleveland and Baltimore) have the two best win percentage in the AL as of right now. The Rangers are easily beating good teams, but that means that they currently have an 18-24 record against below-.500 teams. When comparing a team like the Indians to the Rangers, it makes sense that the Indians are beating up on lesser teams (they currently have a record of 33-17 against below-.500 teams) but getting beaten by better teams; it doesn't make sense that the Rangers can handle teams like Houston and New York but struggle against the Twins. But hey, baseball is random and weird sometimes. How do the National League counterparts compare?

NL East: Washington Nationals

Opponent Wins Losses Runs Scored Runs Allowed Run Differential
Marlins 7 6 47 45 +2
Cardinals 5 2 35 24 +11
Cubs 2 5 28 34 -6
Tigers 2 1 12 11 +1
Mets 9 4 63 36 +27
Dodgers 1 5 21 26 -5
Pirates 2 1 12 3 +9
Indians 1 1 10 8 +2
TOTAL 29 25 228 187 +41

NL Central: Chicago Cubs

Opponent Wins Losses Runs Scored Runs Allowed Run Differential
Cardinals 4 5 41 35 +6
Pirates 9 3 74 46 +28
Nationals 5 2 34 28 +6
Giants 1 2 11 7 +4
Dodgers 3 1 11 8 +3
Marlins 1 3 14 23 -9
Mets 2 5 23 37 -14
Rangers 2 1 10 5 +5
TOTAL 27 22 218 189 +29

(In the) NL West: San Francisco Giants

Opponent Wins Losses Runs Scored Runs Allowed Run Differential
Dodgers 6 4 43 38 +5
Marlins 2 1 19 8 +11
Mets 1 2 12 20 -8
Blue Jays 1 2 6 11 -5
Cubs 2 1 7 11 -4
Cardinals 1 2 12 14 -2
Red Sox 1 3 12 21 -9
Pirates 3 1 27 14 +13
Yankees 1 2 6 9 -3
TOTAL 18 18 144 146 -2

NL Wild Card #1: Los Angeles Dodgers

Opponent Wins Losses Runs Scored Runs Allowed Run Differential
Giants 4 6 38 43 -5
Marlins 0 4 8 16 -8
Blue Jays 2 1 12 9 +3
Mets 4 3 31 19 +12
Cardinals 4 2 34 24 +10
Cubs 1 3 8 11 -3
Nationals 5 1 26 21 +5
Pirates 1 3 15 22 -7
Orioles 1 2 12 15 -3
TOTAL 22 25 184 180 +4

NL Wild Card #2: Miami Marlins

Opponent Wins Losses Runs Scored Runs Allowed Run Differential
Tigers 0 4 18 32 -14
Nationals 6 7 45 47 -2
Mets 5 7 43 42 +1
Giants 1 2 8 19 -11
Dodgers 4 0 16 8 +8
Pirates 3 1 10 16 -6
Cubs 3 1 23 14 +9
Cardinals 2 1 13 14 -1
TOTAL 24 23 176 192 -16

The NL bunch is much more closely bunched around the .500 mark than the AL was; the team that has the best record against over-.500 teams is the Cubs, and they're only 5 games over .500. So, if we look at win percentage, how do these teams shake out?

Team Wins Losses Win % Run Differential
Rangers 41 20 .672 +53
Blue Jays 33 26 .559 +54
Cubs 27 22 .551 +29
Nationals 29 25 .537 +41
Red Sox 32 28 .533 +31
Marlins 24 23 .511 -16
Giants 18 18 .500 -2
Orioles 28 29 .491 -29
Indians 24 25 .490 -19
Dodgers 22 25 .468 +4

Against over-.500 teams, Cleveland is almost the worst among the ten contending teams. That being said, aside from the Rangers, there isn't a team that is significantly better against over-.500 teams. The average win percentage of all ten teams, when playing over-.500 teams, is .531; for Cleveland, they would need a record of 26-23 to get to that win percentage. That's a 2 game difference than where they currently are. I can think of a handful of games over the past couple of weeks that could have easily swung for the Indians if a play or two were just slightly altered. Yes, Cleveland hasn't done as well against better teams as some other contending teams. No, it doesn't mean that they're bad at baseball. In fact, they're very good. The only thing that this really shows is the randomness of a 162 game season. So enjoy the fact that all of those games against sub-.500 teams count just the same as the rest of the games; when combined, the Indians are one of the best teams in baseball.